How did we get here? Well, it’s taken UKIP the best part of six months but finally the party has a leader who seems to want the job and has received a majority of the popular vote.
Paul Nuttall has been a member of UKIP for quite some time and during his campaign he made much of the positions that he held to promote his credentials for leadership. He spent his time travelling around the country helping candidates and the party, and supporting various events. He was frequently seen in Wales, particularly in the North, promoting UKIP by attending events such as the opening of the Blair Smillie/Nathan Gill joint shop in Alyn and Deeside in the GE 2015 campaign.
The fateful events of the 8th to the 12th May 2015 sealed the division between Farage and Nuttall forever. On that Friday afternoon 8th May when Farage had received the decision of the South Thanet electorate and in the wake of his ill-advised resignation, the appointment of Suzanne Evans as interim party leader blew apart the peace that existed in the party.
The meeting of the NEC on the Monday had to deal first with demands for Evans to be confirmed as leader. This was scuppered by Nuttall’s stance who saw anyone ‘appointed’ as getting a head start on any other candidates for the leadership; the NEC then just confirmed the re-appointment of Farage.
So how have we managed to arrive here? It was clear from late 2015 that Farage was finally going but at no stage had a clear successor emerged. The first election proved that with the field of candidates at one point numbering 15, although this reduced to only four on the ballot paper. There were many calls for Paul Nuttall to stand as a candidate and at this stage Steven Woolfe was still in the frame. Why didn’t Nuttall stand? The press recorded personal reasons.
The second time round the pressure on him to stand was much greater and in the end he declared he would run. From the outset he kept his campaign very limited to a flow of the names of the great and good queuing up to express their open support for him. Notable defectors from the Farage camp included Peter Whittle from the London Assembly, Neil Hamilton from the Welsh Assembly, Tim Aker and David Coburn who, together with Peter Whittle, had formed part of the high profile Woolfe campaign. Many of the MEPs joined in with Jonathan Agnew who had called on Nuttall to run the first time. Many of those who have been against Farage either overtly or covertly came out in support of Nuttall.
Was there any doubt in the result? Not really, not because the party had no real appetite for Nuttall, rather they voted for some semblance of order. Is Nuttall a unity candidate? Not in the true sense of the term. His appointments and comments to date have drawn in the strands of the party who opposed Nigel Farage such as Evans and O’Flynn. It has also brought on board party loyalists who seek to support whoever is party leader, which in turn is a very Conservative, mainstream party political action.
It has also brought in Gerard Batten, who for many years was a lone-figure on the outside of the party but who is now very much on the Nuttall side. Will he go further into the UKIP divisions? We will have to see. No decision has yet been announced over Neil Hamilton and David Coburn. As of the end of last month there has been no mention of close Farage supporters such as Ray Finch, but Jill Seymour is back on board. To date all the main figures who backed Nuttall have been found places in the team. These people will be the subject of a second article once the dust has settled.
So what do we know of Paul Nuttall? He was a lecturer before becoming a UKIP MEP and has an interest and expertise in Edwardian politics.
He declares himself to be a practicing Roman Catholic and is a strong supporter of the death penalty and a huge reduction in the time limit on abortion. He favours an English parliament, at one stage calling for the expulsion of Scottish MPs from Westminster. This policy puts him at odds with the current Scottish UKIP group. He has held a number of party positions including deputy leader and chairman, and sits currently as an MEP representing the North West for UKIP. His claim to fame in this post is to have one of the worst attendance records of all MEPs in Brussels.
I first met Nuttall at a public meeting in Warrington when he persuaded me to join UKIP, but what I do know about Paul is that he’s a good tub-thumper and he believes in the UKIP core message of leaving the European Union. His rhetoric claims to say he knows how to appeal to Labour working class voters. We have yet to see if this is true.
He has a style of speaking which has yet to really settle into what would be called his own. Much of his delivery is styled on that of Nigel Farage or could even be said he uses a delivery style learned from a book on public speaking, but whatever it is it appeals to a UKIP party audience. Will that style transfer to the British public as a whole again? That is not yet tested. He handles combative interviews well and is also happy at home sat on the sofas of the nations. The million dollar question that UKIP will have to answer in the next weeks is can they as a party sell Nuttall, an avowed Scouser, to a country which has never been faced with a senior politician with a Liverpudlian persona.
Leave a Reply
36 Comments on “UKIP leadership”
I’m getting the feeling that there’s going to be an early general election and if UKIP is going to have any effect on getting us the Brexit we should have they will need to get their act together pretty soon. To me Brexit wasn’t just about getting out of the EU it is also about kicking out the old established politics out of Westminster and getting MP who want to serve the British people and not Brussels. Westminster at the moment is just another arm of the EU and wholesale reform of it is required.
Who’s Jonathan Agnew? ??
A complete miss print. It was supposed to read Stuart Agnew my apologies to one and all.
I do hope that Ray Finch will not be left out of Paul’s team, or refuse to be in it for whatever reason. I cannot think of any other person who feels more passionately the injustice done to our fishing industry by Horrible Heath and his cowardly acolytes. No one can put the argument for reclamation of our waters more knowledgeably or more convincingly than Ray. I hope to see him on TV putting the undeniable case for getting our exclusive fishing zones back as soon as possible.
Interesting to date the fishing portfolio has already gone elsewhere
Mike Hookem has the portfolio.
Dee,
Yes, that’s right because he has good left hook.
This made me smile
You are right of course, Martin.
That’s why we must have democracy in our own Party. Regrettably we’ve just given up the chance to get it – let’s hope we have another before too long.
Mr Nuttall uttered the words “direct democracy” on the Andrew Marr show this morning. Who is he trying to kid? Now he is too late as it seems there is a new party formed called “Direct Democracy Initiative”. This party is attracting the likes of followers of the idea of direct democracy touted during the leadership campaign. These are/were UKIP members. UKIP had the chance to be the leader in this idea but now even if it is taken up, will be seen to be following unless it gets moving NOW!
Exactly right William. A shame. J RE is hoping to get a DD group within UKIP off the ground as a direct result of the DD Initiative Party, to try and stem the flow. But people are still leaving. Let’s hope that Mr. Nuttall and the NEC support this – especially since Mr. Nuttall’s remarks this morning, maybe people will return if so.
Many thanks for the comments and the dozens of private messages I hoped the article would prove useful. UKIP daily have asked me to follow this with an article of the new NEC when the results are issued and a third on the Nuttall team. UKIP faces huge challenges members need to to know what direction the party is heading, what the vision is and who is going to deliver it.
Hopefully the party will listen to those who actually know what should happen, they refused last time. The amount of money wasted on seats with no team on the ground and a candidate who was floundering ran into 10’s of thousands of pounds. Cannot repeat this.
To keep it short and sweet, we in UKIP needed stability, after months of dismay, Nigel, who I admire, should have stayed his hand, till we had put in place the means for a straight forward transition of leadership, knowing the caliber of the candidates as he would have had, he should have seen the fact they were not as committed as he was, in fact some of them were out to destroy us.
Alan,
Yea, I know Paul is a very busy man but would’nt it be great if he did just post a few words on this site, it does not have to be much just a few reassuring sentences saying he is listening, and perhaps some ideas he has in mind. Come on Paul we are all ears!
Alan
You’re a great breed, but vastly outnumbered by ordinary people who still vote Labour for historical reasons – and no, we haven’t tried very hard to get their votes. Tbe EU and immigration haven’t been enough yet, and won’t be in the future. We have to be a lot more radical.
I’m not interested even in 10 seats. I want 100, and it can be done.
Quercus Robur
“..he believes in the UKIP core message of leaving the European Union.”
Well, that’s reassuring!
Now that, I agree with. (Met you briefly, at southport, 2/3 years ago? Arse of a place to get to, from the north)
The people I would ask are the ex labour colleagues in barrow. In Furness. Chairman Colin Rudd. Unreserved recommendation from this ex Tory kipper. Solid ex labour and smart. And a very hardworking chairman.
Our fear is we know nutkin of old. Holding our breath and hoping.
He is a Christian, that’s good enough for me. The chances of Nuttall being “run” by the Vatican are nil.
Generally speaking the problem is not one of religion, it’s about sects and individuals within religions who use extreme interpretations as a route to personal power.
Flyer,
Somehow just because Paul is a Catholic he will be advocating allowing loads more muslims in, you obviously have not been listening to a word he has been saying. Religion should be a personal thing and remain just that, it should never be part of politics I agree with you there.
Our stance I believe is about culture and family values and the overcrowding of this country, we simply have to stop this madness of mass uncontrolled unsustainable immigration. As far as I am aware UKIP is the only party that wishes to do all that, Paul included.
I may be wrong, but I sense that Nuttall mentioning his religion like this is a subliminal tip of his hat – to those in the electorate who are looking for such things – of him being an opponent to the perceived advances of Mohammedanism in England.
Personally I think religion is a red herring, mass foreign migration (which carries culture & religion in its train as by-products) is the threat.
You may be dead on the button there Ajax.