One unfortunate by-product of Rotherham Labour MPs’ successful libel case against UKIP’s Yorkshire MEP Jane Collins is that some members of our party are now less willing to tackle the national grooming gang scandal – the sexual exploitation and abuse of mainly young white English girls by mostly older Pakistani-heritage Muslim men.
Mind you, there always were senior party members who insisted that UKIP should not touch the issue. When I started investigating grooming gang activities in Hartlepool and Teesside, I was informed that UKIP’s former General Secretary and North East MEP Jonathan Arnott would not engage with the problem because it would be ‘anti-Muslim’ or ‘racist’ to do so.
This is the same sickening politically-correct excuse that the old parties and local authorities use. It has allowed the abuse of thousands of young girls – over 1,400 in Rotherham alone. And it was revealed just last week that men from Pakistani, Bangladeshi and other Muslim backgrounds have openly abused “with arrogant persistence” over 700 girls in Mr Arnott’s own constituency of North East England.
It’s a total disappointment that UKIP’s elected representative for the area decided to pass by on the other side over this problem. We can be pleased he’s now left the party.
But Jane Collins is made of sterner stuff and was absolutely right to expose Labour’s culpability in the Rotherham scandal. Whistle-blower Jayne Senior’s book ‘Broken and Betrayed’, amongst others, provides clear evidence that the Labour-run local authority not only looked the other way but also was responsible for covering up the abuse.
The problem is that Jane Collins chose the wrong Labour target. Instead of attacking the local authority she instead cited the three Rotherham Labour MPs one of whom, Sarah Champion, has in fact campaigned hard since her election in 2012 to protect the girls and expose the scandal. Ms Champion was even sacked from Jeremy Corbyn’s front bench for publicly identifying the rapists as Pakistani men and the victims as white girls. It is, therefore, no surprise that Jane Collins lost the libel case.
But the issue remains and girls are still being abused, and the evidence is that this phenomenon has occurred particularly in Labour fiefdoms like Rochdale, Oldham, Bradford, Blackburn, Derby, Leicester, Oxford, Newcastle – and of course Rotherham.
The destructive effect of Labour’s PC attitudes is horribly illustrated by the devastation caused to the lives of over 1,400 young girls in Rotherham. This is what the government’s independent Casey Review says (p160):
“The case of child sexual exploitation in Rotherham was a catastrophic example of authorities turning a blind eye to harm in order to avoid the need to confront a particular community. The town saw upwards of 1,400 children sexually exploited over more than a decade; groomed by predominantly Pakistani-heritage men offering drugs, alcohol and attention followed by sexual abuse and mental and physical coercion.
Despite the widespread knowledge of this practice across the local authority, statutory partnerships and many local residents, those with the power to act chose to defend ‘community cohesion’ and political correctness over the vulnerable children in their care. Destroying evidence of perpetrator ethnicity and shutting down services was preferable to confronting criminals from a minority ethnic community; such was their fear of offending local cultural sensitivities.”
UKIP is the only national party that opposes political correctness, combats the widespread refusal to see and name reality as it really is, and refuses to play the PC game. We did it over Brexit. We especially did it over mass immigration. Unilaterally we changed the political agenda and reset the political debate; this was because to UKIP it is more important to tell the truth than to avoid offending someone’s feelings or sensibilities.
This doesn’t make us popular with the political class or with some vocal minorities on the Left, but it does make us a radical anti-establishment party that ordinary people like and support.
We now have the electoral opportunity and moral responsibility to enter the fray over the issue. For the sake of the girls and their families who still suffer, we must campaign to terminate Labour Party domination of grooming gang towns across the North and Midlands, and put an end to their harmful political correctness.
Local elections on 3rd May are less than nine weeks away. Let’s start there.
Leave a Reply
24 Comments on “Grooming Gangs: UKIP’s Opportunity and Responsibility”
Sexual exploitation must be prosecuted.
Although the majority of the population, whatever their Race, Creed, & Colour,, are law-abiding, the exceptions, whatever their beliefs must be punished for breaking the law.
but what if… Sarah Chapion was using extreme covering tactics to deflect blame, had she been aware of the said cover up?
Maybe she was desperate to cover up her privaged information that the local council and the 3 MPs were all privy too but did nothing and worse covered it up..? Politics is a selfish dirty game especially by those who would sacrifice children, then offer to help them?
mmThe best way I could think of to support Gerard – supporting him as I do in his his confronting of islam and the immigration isssue – I have sent in a one off extra donation.
Can anyone else spare a little extra in the kitty to show backing for him.
https://electmps-ukip.nationbuilder.com/elect_ukip_mps
Easy to talk as we do, but he needs more than that – so does the party.
Even a tenner can help.
Done
We must fight on this issue,
Fight hard and loudly.
Interestingly Nick Griffin was acquitted by two 9as I remember) courst when he stood up and pointed the finger.
Have we any good lawyers in UKIP
Any good legal minds?
Would it be worth getting the court transcripts from these two outrageously unjust prosecutions and see on which grounds and exactly why he was cleared.
Precedent is always helpful.
It may give us helpful guidelines.
As for Jane Collins – she tried.
Her legal team seem utterly useless – they should have picked up the problem.
How much were they paid?
Extreme negligence in my book.
Emily
Please correct me if I am wrong but the case bankrupted the BNP. Great win, great lawyers, but it finished the BNP.
Can UKIP afford to be a martyr to a single issue however important it may be.
Hitler and Mussolini were equally “intent on 100% domination” of their own party. Indeed when it suited him. Hitler had his own SA members – the “heavy mob” who had helped him win power – murdered by his SS paramilitaries, sworn to serve him personally.
Stalin had all the old Bolsheviks who had led the 1917 revolution expelled, tried and killed.
The BNP also appears to aim at a dictatorship – so is it surprising. Dissent is not tolerated, by definition.
Their leader was not going “rogue” but running true to form.
Why not try Piers Wauchope? He is, or was, on the NEC, and he heads, or used to, a “UKIP lawyers group”.
I wonder how on earth was Jane Collins not advised/aware that Sarah Champion (the one who sued her, as I understand from this article) was not the right target? Indeed, that she was on the right side? It seems to be a quite extraordinary cock-up.
To PPM: Weinstein and even Saville should not be confused with Muslim grooming gangs, by mentioning them you are following
Vince Cable when he used well know names on Question Time and other programmes. He was trying to make the Muslim gang’s crimes
lesser than they were! Kippers should be very careful of bringing distractions into any point they are trying to make.
Of course we (the UK) have our own sexual deviants and so we certainly don’t need to import more and then treat them as though they are untouchable. I believe the problem of Muslim rape gangs goes far beyond what most people can imagine and this is largely because the problem is suppressed by the Establishment.
we need to get a petition going to get the grooming gang members deported from the UK for life
What if the scumbags were born here?
Too bad. If I was born in China doesn’t mean I can’t be sent back to uk.
We need a clear simply political message that the voters understand.
Deport and stop immigration from Pakistan.
Anything less is too complex.
Show me anyone who won’t agree with that message. If they don’t then they are too far gone and would never vote for us anyway.
Send them wherever their ancestors came from.
Regards.
then look them away for life no getting out or there can leave the uk and if there return at any time in there life they go back to jail for life