Latest from UKIP Daily

SOS – Save Our Services. Part One

[Ed: this is Part One of the transcript of the speech given by Henry Bolton at the launch of UKIP’s Campaign ‘Save our Services’. Part Two, touching on PESCO and Border security, will be published here tomorrow.]

Homeless Veterans

Fact:  Charities estimate that there are some 7,000 homeless veterans on Britain’s streets.

Fact:  In the year 2016/17, some 6,500 homes were given to asylum seekers.

Fact:  At the beginning of November the Home Office proposed moving extremists to the top of council housing waiting lists, helping them into education, training or employment and referring them to the NHS for mental health treatment.

Given the situation regarding our homeless veterans, such a suggestion is simply outrageous!

And you know what, there is an alternative: change the law! The Treason Act should be taken out of the Public Order Act and made fit for purpose against returning Jihadi fighters. If they have British passports and have been fighting for, or in any way providing support to this country’s enemies, the answer is not to give them preferential treatment over our own veterans, but is to prosecute them as the traitors they are.

The human cost of serving our Armed Forces is clearly not only paid in blood, pain and anguish on the battlefield. It goes well beyond.

Think for a moment: 7000 homeless servicemen equates to just under 1 in 10 of the entire strength of the army. Now of course not all homeless ex-servicemen are former soldiers, some are former sailors, airmen and marines, but that 1 in 10 figure gives some idea of the scale of the problem.

It’s not just the individuals themselves who are affected by this. It’s the broken marriages and the anguished parents.

And when one sees that homelessness is generally caused by unemployment we can understand that the problem becomes a broader one. Particularly in a country that has, through its education policies, created a two tier workforce: those with degrees and those, increasingly but wrongly considered as second class, without.

Approximately 3.2% of Armed Forces personnel suffer from mental health related issues. The rates in the Army are higher than those in the Marines which have a higher rate of combat readiness and preparedness. Additionally, the rate has almost doubled since 2007 when selection procedures were more rigid and more training was given. This indicates that the more training that’s provided, the better prepared the individual is for the general mental stresses of military life. This suggests that MoD cost-saving cutbacks in training are having an impact on the welfare and safety of our servicemen as well as more obviously compromising combat effectiveness.

UKIP is clear on the urgent need for a Veterans Administration, headed by a minister.

This will provide a single point of contact in relation to healthcare, housing, counselling, education, training rehabilitation, hospital care, access to financial services and benefits.

A UKIP government would build eight veterans’ hostels, each with 200 rooms and modelled on similar hostels already in operation. We would also build 500 affordable rent homes every year specifically for ex-forces personnel.

We would guarantee the offer of a job in the police, prison service or border force for anyone who has served in the Armed Forces for a minimum of 12 years. We will secure our borders, get more police on the streets, have safer prisons and, unlike the Conservative government, we would honour the Military Covenant.

Armed Forces Recruitment

Armed Forces recruitment is a significant challenge, but easily solved. All three services are failing to hit their recruitment targets by around 10%. The MoD gives many reasons for this: for example pay and conditions and less physical fitness and grit amongst younger people. Whilst these are indeed issues, the biggest problem is the outsourcing of Armed Forces recruitment to private companies.

This outsourcing has significantly harmed Armed Forces recruitment. Whereas twenty years ago you could get into the military within only 3 or 4 months after expressing an interest, it can now take a year or more.

Outsourcing company Capita, which has run Army recruitment since 2012 is paid around £44m a year for a 10 year contract and yet, in that time, recruitment has become an ever greater problem.

A UKIP government would end outsourcing of recruitment, returning the recruitment function to the Armed Forces themselves, as always used to be the case.

Defence Expenditure

In terms of Gross Domestic Product UK defence spending was 2.85% of GDP in 2000. But since the Conservative Government came to power, defence spending has been in steady decline, breaking below 2.4 percent of GDP for the first time in 2016.

Lt Gen Ben Hodges, commander of the US Army in Europe, said the UK would be unable to keep up its international commitments if forces were cut further. Lord Dannet, former Chief of the Defence Staff has said that General Hodges remarks are “timely and well founded”.

Other senior military figures are constantly warning the Conservative Government that their cuts are seriously harming our military capability and I, as a former Chief Planner for the EU’s Common Security & Defence Planner, echo their concern. The UK, in military terms, is significantly weaker in both strength and capabilities, compared to other states, than it was 10-15 years ago.

In order to find internal savings to keep things going, the Ministry of Defence is continuing to sell off assets, intending to sell 30% of its built-on land (barracks etc). Whilst this will release public sector land for 55,000 new homes to be built, it will make any future enlargement of the armed forces difficult and expensive as there will be no barracks to accommodate the personnel and new ones would have to be built. And these things can only be sold once.

In addition, because the Ministry of Defence has failed to apply HM Treasury rules properly, the Treasury has imposed a £31.6 million fine on the MoD. That’s like a bank charging you for a letter telling you that you are overdrawn!

The Army is now at 78,000 soldiers, down from 102,500 in 2010. Main Battle Tank strength has been cut by 40 per cent (Britain now has fewer Main Battle Tanks than neutral Switzerland) and there has been a 35 per cent cut in self-propelled artillery.

Together, the Royal Air Force and the Royal Navy have suffered more than 10,000 job losses. The Ministry of Defence is now planning to sell HMS Ocean, HMS Albion and HMS Bulwark, thereby ending the UK’s ability to conduct amphibious landings,  and around 1,000 Royal Marines are likely to be axed (1/6th of the entire Royal Marine force).

There are those that will undoubtedly argue that in the modern world we do not require large Armed Forces. Let’s look at that for a moment:

The conflict in Eastern Ukraine has been characterised by the use not only of lightly armed irregular forces, but also by the use of Multi-Launch Rocket Systems (MLRS) and main battle tanks. I know. I was there for 4 or 5 months. Signals intelligence and jamming along with cyber-warfare have been employed constantly. The simple fact is that British Armed Forces may still be called upon to fight in any scenario. It’s an uncomfortable truth for this government that not all wars are like that we fought in Afghanistan.

I have served in the Regular and Territorial Army, as a tank soldier, infantry and intelligence officer for a total of nearly 20 years. I have spent the subsequent 20 years in places such as Kosovo, Macedonia and Helmand alongside my military colleagues. Since I joined the army in 1979, I have seen the massive downgrading of our military capabilities compared with those of other states.

Cuts in training have demoralised our Armed Forces and reductions in full spectrum capabilities have left the nation unprepared to face present, let alone emerging threats.

In the context of BREXIT, these reductions are of grave concern.

UKIP would phase in increased defence spending during its first five years in power, up to an additional £5 billion by 2027. We will rebuild our Armed Forces and restore them to their rightful place among the most professional, flexible and effective fighting forces in the world, able to meet the security demands of the modern era and react appropriately to any threat that the UK faces both now and in the future. In forthcoming months our detailed plans will emerge.

[To be continued tomorrow, including the statement on PESCO.]

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
About Henry Bolton OBE (5 Articles)

Henry Bolton OBE is the Leader of UKIP

14 Comments on SOS – Save Our Services. Part One

  1. I watched Henry on Daily Politics today, talking about PESCO. Nothing spectacular but a good solid performance. The guy knows what he’s talking about and it showed.

  2. Just about to send this to my MP, Nick Herbert. Let’s hope that many others will write along similar lines to their MP.

    Dear Nick

    PESCO

    As you know the EU remains headed for Fiscal, Political and Military Union. It has already proposed that the UK should give up it’s nuclear deterrent and its seat on the UN Security Council, something which the British people have never voted for

    Now at least 23 EU Member states have joined a common Defence Unit prior to a binding agreement to be signed on 11th December. Some seem to expect the UK to join that arrangement, whilst having little say in how it might develop.

    Meanwhile the Foreign Secretary seems to have agreed that the UK should join “as a flying buttress’ to PESCO. Clearly it is not viable for the UK to maintain an independent Foreign Policy, without having independent control of our armed forces.

    Our military obligations under Clause 4.3 of the Lisbon Treaty must of course expire with Brexit, leaving Parliament (not the EU) with full authority to decide on when we go to war. Those obligations must not be replaced surreptitiously by another agreement, which undermines it.

    As the PM said, “Brexit means Brexit”. So I look forward to receiving your assurance that the UK will not allow its political, military or Fiscal independence to be undermined in that way.

  3. Good job. Whilst this might not be the range of “sweeping policy” much needed, it is, at least, a clear indication of direction and tackles a hugely important issue.

  4. This is all well and good, however it is just skirting around the real problem whilst studiously avoiding naming it.

    I was working on a defence project at the time that the 7/7/2005 London bombings occurred. It made me question why I was working on such a project, given that our enemy was already within our borders, and thriving thanks to the generosity of our government abusing my tax money.

    I read the Koran for the first time after that attack. Violent jihad is mandated in the Koran. It is NOT a perversion of a peaceful religion, as Blair was asserting.

    No lessons had been learned by the time Lee Rigby was murdered. Cameron was still parroting the Blair lies. Clegg held a press conference and quoted the passage from the Koran about – whoever kills a man it is as though he kills all mankind… Ignorant fool. That very verse can be quoted to justify the murder. Can we have some sort of straight talking on Islam from political leaders, or is that too much to ask?

    https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/02/obama-islam-prohibits-terrorism-for-the-quran-says-whoever-kills-an-innocent-it-is-as-if-he-has-killed-all-mankind

    Our armed forces have been making “corruption in the [Islamic] lands” for many years. Other translations render this as “spreading mischief”:

    https://www.thereligionofpeace.com/pages/games/quran-all-life-sacred.aspx

  5. Um – ‘about Henry’ 🤔I thought he was leader – keep up at the back there, update needed

  6. Nice to see HR`s efforts to restrengthen our three services and to look after destitute ex-servicemen.

    However, as I understand it our government has never really had a proper defence review, having taken many decisions on a cost basis only, in any case the review has only covered requirements pertaining to us as a subject member of the EU.

    I note HB`s intention to direct UKIP`s efforts towards defining what our nation will be doing after Brexit, I hope it will be realised that our re-emergence as a world power will require that we have the real power to back up our façade of power. i.e our defence must be global and we must once again really punch above our weight. We will no longer be able to hide behind the skirts of our supposed security deals with our EU partners.
    It has to be understood any such agreements will only be treaties – they will cease to have the compulsion of the Commission and the ECJ to compel performance.
    UKIP must call for a proper defence review which will reflect the new circumstances of Brexit.

  7. As a serving Soldier I don’t quiet agree with this and as a ukip member I certainly don’t agree with this.
    Stop the corporate speak.
    Brexit is where it is at.
    Not more money into the civil service

  8. Excellent work Viv! Got it on the site even before it reached UKIP.org. What a scoop for you.

  9. Private Eye has been scathing on the outsourcing to Crapita…

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*