Latest from UKIP Daily

SOFT GENOCIDE

~~~ o ~~~ GRASPING THE NETTLE ~~~ o ~~~~

If one looks at a map of the ancient world, one will see the names of many peoples whose cultures have long disappeared: Hittites; Phoenicians; Scythians, for example. What became of these peoples?

Could the English, Welsh or other European peoples be on the brink of disappearing like those ancient peoples – either by population replacement or loss of cultural identity? Will historians of the future study how a once-great world-leading culture destroyed itself?

Britain at the time of the Romans was occupied by various Celtic tribes, as had been much of Western Europe at one time. Our history books tell us that first the Angles, Saxons and Jutes invaded from Germany and pushed the Celts westward. Then came the Vikings from Scandinavia. While there were some migrants, it wasn’t a wholesale population displacement. The genetic stock remained for the most part the same. It was mostly a cultural and aristocratic change. Over a few centuries those who had been mostly Celts took on Anglo-Saxon language and customs and the English nation was born.

At the 2011 census the white British represented 82% of the British population. This may not suggest extinction anytime soon. Official figures which came out this year show that 14% of the population was born abroad. More strikingly, more than a third of babies born in England and Wales now have at least one parent born abroad. At this rate we are heading for a dramatic demographic change, within a few short decades.

As discussed above, national identity is a cultural rather than genetic phenomenon. Many immigrants and their descendants who have come to this country since the Second World War have become thoroughly British or have successfully integrated, while retaining pride in their family heritage. We should encourage and expect immigrants to assimilate over time.

Integration is hampered however, both by the pace and sheer number of arrivals – officially 650,000 annually – the importation of so many followers of a religion which resists assimilation and the leftist doctrine of multiculturalism, which holds that it is racist to expect immigrants to adapt to the host culture and that our national identity is something to be ashamed of.

I deliberately use the word ‘assimilate’. A harmonious nation is not one which sustains parallel cultures and opposing identities. It’s one in which people share fundamentally the same culture, identity and rules of conduct. The principle is newcomers should take on the ways of the land which they have chosen to come to, and surely were attracted by. Instead the host culture is expected to adjust to the ways of the newcomers.

Eastern European immigrants will likely assimilate more easily – though any influx which is so large as to establish a self-perpetuating diaspora will hamper assimilation. Third world immigrants are less culturally similar, so present more of a problem. Paul Collier in his book ‘Exodus’ points out that the reason why industrialised societies are wealthier than Third World ones is because they have better functioning and more co-operative cultures – but by importing large numbers of immigrants from the third world, we import those dysfunctional cultures.

The Cultural Marxists regard the lands and cities, such as pre-war Eastern Europe and India, as models of different peoples, cultures and religions living side-by-side. In fact that was the very reason why those places were inherently unstable, resulting in war and atrocities. Since World War Two they have pursued the highly irresponsible policy of installing such potential instability and conflict across Western Europe.

I have previously written articles on this site about the other side of population replacement – the collapse in the white British birth rate. These trends apply across Europe and are indeed more pronounced in some other countries.

When it comes to peoples such as the Native Americans, Tibetans and Aborigines, mass immigration of foreigners, loss of culture and population collapse is seen as a bad thing. When it comes to European peoples, the opposite view is taken – because of course we are the oppressors – so our destruction is welcomed. As white German Green politician Stefanie von Berg asserted regarding ethnic Germans becoming a minority in their country, “That is a good thing.”

While the Scots and Welsh can push their nationalism, Englishness or Britishness is seen as the oppressor culture. TV presenter Laurence Llewelyn-Bowen thinks the term ‘England’ itself is racist. On top of this we have a popular culture which encourages young people to emulate American gangsta rappers or speak in a fake West Indian accent.

We need to get a perspective before using words such as ‘genocide’, ‘tyranny’ or ‘fascism’ and not exaggerate. I have just returned from holidaying in Germany. It is harrowing to visit museums and see the pictures of people suffering the final humiliation of being stripped naked before being shot into a mass grave of smiling children who died in human experimentation. (At least Germany is honest about this. In Russia you don’t see exhibitions of GULAG atrocities. Our media doesn’t show you pictures of civilians killed in Allied bombing raids on Iraq or Syria.)

We don’t live under a full-blown police state (though we do seem to be moving in a worrying direction). Our government isn’t systematically killing people. No one is being deported to GULAGs or concentration camps.

It would seem rather extreme to describe what is happening to European peoples as genocide, wouldn’t it? The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines genocide as “the deliberate and systematic destruction of a racial, political, or cultural group.” Rather than in the brutal, familiar understanding of genocide – hard genocide, we might call it – genocide could take place over an extended time with minimal violence and maximum persuasion – soft genocide.

To fulfil the above definition, destruction must be deliberate. Contributors to this site often refer to the ‘Coudenhove-Kalergi plan’. This architect of European integration notoriously stated:

“The man of the future will be of mixed race. Today’s races and classes will gradually disappear owing to the vanishing of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future, similar in its appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples with a diversity of individuals”.

Personally I’m sceptical this comment has grown into a full-blown clandestine plan, but if it had, the powers that be across Europe couldn’t be doing more than they are to accomplish it.

 

[Ed: This is the ninth article in the series. There are more to come which will be published here in the next days. Read Article Eight here, Seven here, Six here and Five here,  and find links to the earlier articles at the bottom of the page here.]

 

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
About Comrade K (36 Articles)
Part of the London diaspora, Comrade K. now lives in exile in Cardiff, where he is active in his local UKIP branch. He has come a circuitous political route from enjoying winding-up leftists at school, but then, because he thought the ‘60s seemed really cool even though he wasn’t there, indulging revolutionary socialist fantasies during his student years, even going so extreme as becoming a Labour party activist for several years. K. however eventually came round to sense and, despite being seduced by some green philosophies which he still hasn’t entirely repudiated, realised that free-thinking, intelligence and individuality is something entirely different to mindlessly repeating what all his trendy friends and celebrity icons told him … plus he found that going along with feminism didn’t get him girlfriends after all.

10 Comments on SOFT GENOCIDE

  1. You may all want to watch this video too:

    “PARIS RIOTS 2017 | Why The Media Is Silent | Marine Le Pen | The Death Of France | French Election.”

    https://youtu.be/BkgZVK9QlxI

  2. All very interesting stuff and sadly, very likely to have more than grains of truth in both the article and all the responses.
    The question I would pose however is, will UKIP as a party stand up for members with these views?
    I do not know. I am not well informed enough.
    From my position, that of a confused member, it seems to me that the leading lights of the party such as AMW and JRE, who would have lead the campaign to shed light on this subject, have gone their separate ways and left the party. Will HB and what remains of UKIP take this battle on?

    • Nope.

      Our Glorious Leader stated yesterday that over the past several months, UKIP membership has dropped monthly by around 800-1000, excepting one.

      Could that just possibly have been the month Anne Marie was approved as leadership candidate?

      UKIP is finished. Would the last member with any sort of guts leaving the party please turn out the lights, the remainder won’t need them, they have blinkers on.

      By the by, why is Henry making maintenance announcements on UKIPDaily – I thought it was an independant site. Has he taken over??

      • If you had read my accompanying editorial note, you might have seen that UKIP Daily republished this as service to members who have not received this letter. The reason for that, as mentioned by HB, is the dire email system.
        We’ve done the same service in the past – and frankly, I somewhat resent the insinuation that UKIP Daily ‘has been taken over’ by Henry Bolton, for republishing that letter. You might as well ask if UKIP Daily has been taken over by various branches whose invitations we publish. HO and indeed HB did not ask us to do so, never mind told us to.
        All of us are fully aware that inner-party communications have been and are atrocious. Trying to keep members informed on what’s happening in the Party, during these next 12-18 months within which HB hopes to make our comms system fit for purpose, surely is what members want, and is not = ‘being taken over’.

  3. Muslims only infiltrate, they do not and never have integrated.

  4. Meanwhile the Telegraph reports that (a premium article unfortunately):

    “Britain must accept more immigrants if it wants a free trade deal, Indian diplomat warns”

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/11/23/britain-must-accept-immigrants-wants-free-trade-deal-warns-senior/

    I wonder how long it’ll take Appeaser May to cave in on that one? You need to get rid of this dangerous and incompetent woman.

    India is one of those countries where the population is exploding out of control. I’ve spoken to several Indian immigrants and they are just desperate to get away. Why should we make the UK like India, why should this be our problem?

    I can see it all now: ‘we’re leaving the EU and we need trade deals’ will be the excuse, something like that.

    We don’t need trade deals where immigration is part of the package, the UK is already overpopulated and immigration is getting to be an exponentially increasing problem.

    I’ve already written about this, have a read, it’s frightening:

    “Surviving the human tsunami”

    http://www.ukipdaily.com/surviving-human-tsunami/

    I suppose the diplomats trying to negotiate this deal will already have brought their retirement properties in London.

  5. Speaking of genocide, it is interesting witness the west’s double standard we see when dealing with Serb war criminals and those of ISIS.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-42080090

    Mladic was indeed guilty of war atrocities, however why has the west not applied the same criterion to ISIS fighters?
    Surely members of ISIS should stand trial for war crimes, they have murdered POWs, murdered civilians, had mass graves, terrorism, rape, enslaved, committed genocide with Yazidi’s and Coptic Christians, robbed, destroyed historical ruins and artifacts, their list of crimes endless.
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/afp/article-5107265/Yazidi-mass-grave-Iraqs-Sinjar.html

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/isis-sex-slave-iraq-woman-ordeal-escape-account-nadia-murad-yazidi-last-girl-a8072336.html

    Again why no demand for trial? These maniacs are worse than the Serbs, yet we have seen them welcomed back to the west with open arms. No trials, no prison sentences, nothing.

    Essentially I believe there will never be a trial, because if ISIS stand trial then Islamism will be on trial too. They will simply point to the Koran as their justification for their behaviour. As we saw with the leaked Clinton emails, their alleged gulf financial benefactors would also be named and shamed. The money trails will not be followed, they won’t let it and the west has too many arms deals dependent on the gulf states.

    These are one group of genocidal maniacs who will sadly be off the hook…

  6. The government has access to every population statistic at their fingertips.

    The Birth rate the continued mass immigration the rights that are being afforded to EU citizens and indeed all will destroy us, the Government know this and are endorsing it.

    They are providing housing, our money, targeted diversity propaganda and every resource they can to facilitate our demise and change Britain and its people beyond recognition.

    When the facts are laid bare they point to a progressive accelerating destruction of our people by approved government policy, can there be any other conclusion?

    All across London we have schools that contain maybe a miniscule percentage of indigenous children, a minuscule amount of indigenous public transport users, very few shops are owned by indigenous people the staff are mainly foreign the effects of the Government replacement policy is there for all to visually see.

    We should understand the statistic and what is visually going on around us, soft imposed genocide looks upon us, maybe it should be called velvet genocide.

  7. Here is an example of the type of propaganda used to promote the idea that flooding Europe with unassimilable aliens would be beneficial and that only evil racists would object.

    https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/europe-s-immigration-challenge

    We see that David Milliband is promoting the idea that the EU ‘needs’ to import 0.5 million ‘refugees’.

    What is important is that people examine the group loyalties of people pushing this anti-white agenda; if they do they will be able to put two and two together and realise that they genuinely belong to an alien enemy within. Actually it us or them so are we prepared to go away and die so these evil people can take over our continent?

  8. In 2016 60.6% of babies born in England and Wales were white British. That has fallen from 65% in 2014, i.e. 2.2% a year. At that rate of decline white British babies will become a minority in 2022. Once that happens, white Britons becoming a minority in the population as a whole will only be a matter of time.

    https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/livebirths/bulletins/birthcharacteristicsinenglandandwales/2016

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*