Latest from UKIP Daily


FRANCIS: Why are you always on about women, Stan?

STAN: I want to be one.

REG: What?

STAN: I want to be a woman. From now on, I want you all to call me ‘Loretta’.

REG: What?!

LORETTA: It’s my right as a man.

JUDITH: Well, why do you want to be Loretta, Stan?

LORETTA: I want to have babies.

REG: You want to have babies?!

LORETTA: It’s every man’s right to have babies if he wants them.

REG: But… you can’t have babies.

LORETTA: Don’t you oppress me.

REG: I’m not oppressing you, Stan. You haven’t got a womb! — Where’s the foetus going to gestate?! You going to keep it in a box?!

JUDITH: Here! I– I’ve got an idea. Suppose you agree that he can’t actually have babies, not having a womb, which is nobody’s fault, not even the Romans’, but that he can have the right to have babies.

FRANCIS: Good idea, Judith. We shall fight the oppressors for your right to have babies, brother. Sister. Sorry.

REG: What’s the point?


REG: What’s the point of fighting for his right to have babies when he can’t have babies?!

FRANCIS: It is symbolic of our struggle against oppression.

REG: It’s symbolic of his struggle against reality.

Many of you will recognise that scene from Monty Python’s ‘Life of Brian’. It was hilarious in 1979 (unless you were one of the Christians campaigning to have the film banned for blasphemy). The scene sends up left wing fringe groups by having them argue over asserting a right which, at the time, was considered ridiculous.

In 2017 it’s not fringe, ridiculous or funny. The government plans to introduce a Gender Recognition Bill to “de-medicalise” transgenderism. If you feel you ‘identify’ as the other sex, you’ll simple be able to write off and have your birth certificate changed – no need to be diagnosed with gender dysphoria and live as the other sex for at least two years, as currently is the case. You’ll then be legally the other sex, regardless of your biological sex or genitalia, and legally be able to enforce being described as your chosen sex. The proposed bill will go out for consultation, but only among the LGBT community.

Some have rightly expressed concern at how this will allow biological men to access women’s changing rooms, toilets and other facilities and compete against women in sports and that it is open to abuse.

My objection is more fundamental. This is an ideological denial of reality – that gender is non-binary, a social construct we are free to choose which has nothing to do with our bodies – and it’s backed-up with legal compulsion.

Gender is binary. There’s male and female. This is the basis of sexual reproduction. It applies to all but the simplest animals, along with much of the plant kingdom. This has been the case for over a billion years. Men have penises and testicles and tend be larger and more muscular. Women have vaginas and wombs and lactate. Males have XY chromosomes. Females XX. This is biological reality. It is not a social construct or something you choose as your identity.

There are people who are confused about their sex, those with rare medical conditions such as hermaphroditism and transvestites, who have been the butt of many jokes over the years. However a physical man who simply identifies as a woman (or vice versa) is not a real woman any more than, if he decided he identified as a squirrel or a lettuce, he would be those things. All these cases should be treated as a mental health issues, rather than the rest of us being compelled to go along with the delusion. Even a man who has undergone gender reassignment surgery, however good the results, is still a mutilated, reconstructed and medicated biological man (and vice versa).

This Bill is even more staggering as it is being proposed, not by Jeremy Corbyn’s loony left Labour Party, but by the supposed Conservative party. Even they have completely surrendered to the identity politics of the left. God forbid anyone might think of them as ‘the nasty party’. The legislation will of course will be waved through by all parties, despite it being a logical offence to many voters. At least UKIP to their credit denounced it.

I note that Justine Greening – the Secretary of State for Education, Minister for Women and Equalities – who is pushing this Bill, is herself a lesbian. Some readers may recall that in a recent article on this site I noted that at least three candidates for the UKIP leadership are gay or lesbian. This does not necessarily mean they support this legislation or the transgender agenda associated with it. I’d like to know their positions on it though.

Frankly this stuff petrifies me. I have an infant son who will be going to school in a few short years. Transgenderism is increasingly being promoted and ‘education’ about it being mandated even in primary schools. Campaigners are keen to identify transgender kids as young as possible, because it’s easier to start gender reassignment before puberty. How many children will be sucked into this, who are just going through a phase and do not understand the implications, to have their bodies mutilated and lives ruined, and will come to regret it in later life? This could be a tragedy on a huge scale. I’ve already heard talk of a class action by victims.

What is striking is how this transgender agenda has swept through in what seems like just a couple of years. The Cultural Marxist structures already in place are being swiftly utilised: the liberal media; influence over young people; celebrity virtue signalling; well (often publicly) funded pressure groups; political consensus; equalities legislation; corporate policies; hate speech laws and web censorship. Reason didn’t stand a chance. I can’t even go the cashpoint now without it cheerfully telling me the bank’s phasing out gender-specific pronouns. Soon we’ll be risking court if we don’t use gender neutral pronouns like “ze”.

As for Monty Python, they’ll probably cut that scene from future re-releases, like they rewrite children’s books to make them politically correct.

Photo by Liz Henry

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
About Comrade K (41 Articles)
Part of the London diaspora, Comrade K. now lives in exile in Cardiff, where he is active in his local UKIP branch. He has come a circuitous political route from enjoying winding-up leftists at school, but then, because he thought the ‘60s seemed really cool even though he wasn’t there, indulging revolutionary socialist fantasies during his student years, even going so extreme as becoming a Labour party activist for several years. K. however eventually came round to sense and, despite being seduced by some green philosophies which he still hasn’t entirely repudiated, realised that free-thinking, intelligence and individuality is something entirely different to mindlessly repeating what all his trendy friends and celebrity icons told him … plus he found that going along with feminism didn’t get him girlfriends after all.


  1. Ann Wilson-Rawi // August 6, 2017 at 11:40 pm // Reply

    It hurts to see commentators once again turn on equal marriage as a bad thing. As a gay person i was surprised how pleased i was when this was brought in. All my life on the margins of society.. accepted at last! But we werent accepted were we you just hid your spiteful reactions until you were with the like minded .pauline Christians & Islam. Its sad. Im sad.

  2. Undemocratic policies forced on the majority by the few and once introduced into law an attack on nature and Christian society.

    I find Justine Greening and her supporters extremely offensive, when are we going to be given a political opportunity to vote for polices at the ballot box that will put an end to this manipulation and destruction of a sensible well ordered society.

  3. I was just thinking about how I hear from so many parents nowadays, “My little [Jack], he’s autistic.”
    I had never heard the word ‘autistic’ until the film ‘Rainman’ in the late 1980s. Nor had many other people. There’s even a line in the film where he thinks gets it confused with ‘artistic’.
    In a few years’ time you’ll be hearing, “My little [Gaia], ze’s trans.”
    Prepare yourself.

  4. There is a nuclear option to all of this but its painful to admit.

    I now want England to be governed by socially conservative and Christian Poland with them as the dominant power. I don’t care anymore, the Poles are now better placed to be our leaders.

    Treason? Big deal now after 20 years of non stop cultural Marxism.

    I am now hoping that a referendum concerning Polish sovereignty over England can be arranged.

  5. Comrade K, an excellent article, and you have pretty much summed up my feelings on this whole matter!

    Apart from the ‘normalisation’ of this which is becoming increasingly apparent in the media, I wonder how long it will be before these people start imposing this ideology on their pets?

    One of our products that we sell online from our pet ranges, are ‘vegan pet foods’ for dogs and cats. Yes, that’s right, our canine and feline friends that are unlucky enough to have vegan owners, can now be force-fed vegetarian cat/dog food. And there was me thinking that cats and dogs were carnivores!

    Not content with rewriting history, it seems these Marxists also now want to rewrite biology.

    I’ve no problem with people who are gay if that’s their choice. But I strongly object to the wholesale normalisation of homosexuality and transgenderism that is currently taking place, and I object to having it imposed on people against their will.

  6. Guy Leven-Torres // August 3, 2017 at 6:58 pm // Reply

    They are even rewriting our history too. It will be illegal shortly to deny that civilisation came out of Africa and that Cleopatra and the Egyptian were negro. The Planck Institute in Switzerland has found that Egyptian DNA is European. One of my colleagues has already been disciplined for not teaching about a “black history” of Egypt. The BBC are now telling school children that Romans were black and that the burka was widespread in UK in Victorian times. This lunacy is widespread.

    They also now claim that Battle of Britain pilots were black. It gets crazier by the hour. My father is RAF wartime and still alive and he is speechless.

  7. OMG
    and we just used to talk about the implicit feminism said to be present in all men
    the implicit masculinism in all women.

    Then, most of us regarded it as a joke, but perhaps genetically there are those “qualities” and perhaps some of them are stronger and emerge as “overt” from .time to time.
    I, for one, learned to accept them as freaks of nature and grew to approve of surgical gender reassignment.
    However, I do not approve of mass artificial prodding to search their innermost conscioces, just to ascertain if there is any liability of men, women and children to head in that direction.
    Just as I dislike proselytization of homosexuality and now, gender self ascernment, I dislike zealotry (as happened in some child sexual abuse investigations) and I also see it as another form of “grooming” and abuse.
    “Marxist English” – what the hanfan is that?

    An excellent article Comrade K and one that deserves the widest dissemination and debate. Do not be silenced as we are heading towards collective cultural and social suicide. This is the kind of thing that makes me despair and think that there is nowhere I can realistically go to on planet earth with my family to escape the descent into a hellish brave new world.
    It is far worse in Sweden where transgenderism is compulsory for all kindergarten/nursery/infant schoolchildren. The results will be seen in 10-15 years from now – if the experiment lasts that long. There will be both mass suicides and also uncontrollable anger/violence which might lead to real anarchy and nihilism. This is not playing with fire and insulting a million years of evolution; this is the possible destruction of society as we know it.
    In a somewhat milder way we have been here before in 16thC Bohemia where sexual licence and turning the world upside down led to the implosion of that country and the end of sovereignty as a nationstate, Even today the term ‘bohemian’ automatically implies a refusal to live a normal standard life and to break the rules of nature as a consequence.
    I weep for my children.
    Both Amber Rudd and Justine Greening share the kind of beliefs I normally associate with marxist filth.

  9. Comrade K, this comes to me as a breath of fresh air, a much-needed jolt of sanity in this increasingly looney world we now find ourselves in. The looneys who push this madness deserve our derision although there is nothing even remotely funny about the fact that they are bent (and that they most certainly are!) on openly and corporately grooming and sexualising children should be seen for what it is, child abuse. In other words, this is a child protection issue.

    As for their attempts to force us to converse in Marxist English I for one would like to tell them where to go but I won’t. Being a Christian I’ll leave that one up to God.

    Here’s what Jesus once said: “Suffer little children to come unto me…” he also said: “But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea.”

  10. The government is beyond salvation; or at least Justine Greening is. I doubt if the likes of Jacob Rees-Mogg will support such a Bill; but of course such sensible, decent people are a minority in government. First it was gay marriage, and the objecting Christians had the screams of “homophobe” hurled at them because everyone said “oh but it won’t affect YOUR marriage”… then it was stepped up to prosecuting bakers for not producing gay wedding cakes; then everything spoken against the homosexual agenda was classed as “hate speech”….pastors are still arrested for reading certain Bible passages…and now it’s the so-called transgenders’ turn. You see, gay marriage was just the start of this ratchet-up, but it seems so few people recognised it at the time.

    I’m afraid that the transgender beliefs are between the two ears of an individual and in no way associated with the equipment that Nature gave them during their nine months’ gestation. This Conservative government is proposing to allow men to simply self-certify as women….God knows where that will lead. The country sat back and laughed at the church-goers who warned that gay marriage would open the door to other things. And it has. You’re not laughing now, are you?

    • ChrisK,

      You’re absolutely correct.

      Rational people (Christians and many non Christians) knew that same sex marriage was the not so thin end of the wedge.

      The ground work for this was laid with the 2004 gender recognition act, which allowed mentally ill people to legally change their gender.

      With the objective truth of biological gender denounced in favour of fictitious “social constructs”, the LGBT lobby and the marxists could bring about the full destruction of civilisation more quickly.

      So Cameron pushed through same-sex marriage.

      And now men and women can quickly and easily self certify as whatever gender they like.

      This particular attack on the objective truth of gender and biology will end in the abolition of the age of consent.

      Indeed there are already murmurs and whispers in LGBT circles to start a campaign for this now. Expect them to campaign to reduce it to 14, then 12, then 10, then for complete abolition.

      Of course anyone who objects to this will be committing a hate crime, and trying to deny children their “sexual rights”.

      This is what happens when a society believes it’s too good for Christian principles and values.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.