Latest from UKIP Daily

Looking back – looking forward: an analysis, Part 2

[We published Part One here]

So, is there a vacancy to be filled in British politics?  Would a large enough number of voters want to be able to consider voting for a party that is:

  • committed to Brexit;
  • have realistic sensible economic policies that will encourage business;
  • committed to reduce immigration and to put the interests of indigenous Brits and their safety before foreigners;
  • be firm on crime and the courage to be honest about the causes and the extent;
  • sort out corruption and the institutionalised political correctness in the police that led to the start and continuation of “child abuse on an industrial scale”;
  • would have the courage to be honest with the public about the country’s debt level, and the consequences;
  • Present a viable plan  for the NHS to be able to cope with increasing pressures;
  • have ideas to bring sense to education – that money is spent on relevant education to equip people with the skills that we need, so that people leave education with relevant meaningful qualifications that employers can have confidence in;
  • have the courage to tell the electorate that no government can get everything right but, if a particular policy appears not to be working being flexible and trying to put matters right is an important virtue;
  • be willing to give approval of major policies to the electorate through referenda.

Over the years,a  sufficient number of voters have crossed from Lab to Con and back again to swap the party in power. Each time they celebrate electing the new government, then slowly realisation comes that the promised miracle improvement to their lives isn’t going to happen, so it’s back to the start. Where is the alternative? After continually swallowing the same old lies time and time again, surely it’s time the Brits woke up and looked reality in the face.

A possible alternative was UKIP. Prior to the 2014 EU elections support for UKIP increased. Nigel was saying what many people wanted to hear – we should leave the EU, immigration too high. UKIP had policies such as a moratorium on immigration for 5 years, and that major policies should be put to the electorate for approval in referenda. This was music to the ears of many people like myself who rarely voted, as we realised that our vote previously made no difference.  Party membership increased. However, this also brought in newcomers, former members of other political parties who saw a rising UKIP as a good career move.

It seems to me that their influence, together with that  of some of the existing UKIP Elite, muted these policies, I felt that the UKIP that promoted radical policies and gave voters an alternative had been castrated by people who wanted to generally keep the status quo, but have a nice career move.

There may be another election before too long. Voters will have the choice between Tories who want to carry on as they have done since 2010 (no change to immigration, no courage to face up to our debt, and remain in EU).  Labour with Corbynomics and no control of immigration, Abbott as Home Secretary … Liberals – wishy washy on everything.

Surely, if there was any time for a radical but sensible party to step forward and offer to put right the wrongs of the establishment, to fight for and listen to the people, not just on one issue but on the many that affect our lives, there cannot be a better time than now. But who could lead us to the promised land?

I, and I believe others, would be willing to put our heads above the parapet and face up to the leftist thugs, put up with the smears and bending the truth of the MSM and possible persecution by the  Thought Police. But not many would do so for a leadership and for MEPs who appear to just want a nice  life; playing it cool till the EU salaries run out; possibly thinking of the future and a move to another party …

Nigel appears to have had enough and after what he has put up with for his country and UKIP, I for one can’t blame him. Kippers surely deserve to have a good choice of candidates for the leadership election with various points of view, not just the Elite approved ones.

Now is an opportunity to find a leader who could be literally the saviour of our country – before it is too late.The voter deserves an alternative: a party which will strongly defend the British people in their own country.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

5 Comments on Looking back – looking forward: an analysis, Part 2

  1. All those people who voted for Corbyn. It was hardly due to his stance on Islam ! More about the fact that a tiny proportion of the establishment are determined to keep we plebs in our place and because he lied about the money tree. For heaven’s sake stop with the anti Muslim stuff. They are not on the streets in huge numbers wanting to install islamic law on the rest of us. Indeed we have perfectly adequate criminal and civil law, if only the “powers that be” can be persuaded to use it impartially. There is loads that can be done, carefully and sensitively, to protect our national culture and identity, without whipping up hatred.

    Politics is mostly about money and tax, it’s distribution and how it’s made and spent. Under the FPTP system we will not prosper and the old parties have no incentive to change. It is still possible to be a threat to seats, the only thing that influences politicians. We just need to be a united party and have a few realistic policies. If all you are concerned with is religion, go join a party concentrates on that and take Tommy Robinson with you, don’t try to take over UKIP.
    Make no mistake we are at a crossroads now, One leads to a mainly anti Islamic theme and the other to a more moderate, wider and inclusive approach to the nation’s problems. The leadership contest will determine who wins. The loosing side will need to leave.

  2. Today I am really happy to note that Anne Maries Fund at has now passed her initial target of 10.000 pounds.

    It has reached 10.254 pounds from 230 donations, so congratulations are in order to all of us who contributed.

    The fight though is really just begining and so I note that Anne Marie has now raised the bar to 20.000 pounds.
    Let’s hope that this target can also be reached!!!

  3. UKIP cannot prosper. The existing regime under Steve Crowther and his acolytes are why nothing will change.
    If you want all the things listed as well as what just about everyone on UKIP Daily desires is a party of the grassroots so we can be involved on a daily basis, putting our energy into creating and spreading our policy agenda. That cannot be done with the present regime. Only a fresh new party can move forward without the baggage of the UKIP establishment and recent past-leaders failures.

  4. No mention of Islam. It is the single biggest issue that must be dealt with urgently.

    The points made here may be good, but unless this issue is tackled then we will be beyond the point of no return very soon, and all other policy ideas then become irrelevant.

    • Brian Williams // July 3, 2017 at 2:44 pm // Reply

      Abolutely. Until we address the clear and present danger to our culture, our declining birthrate, and our entrapment in laws that prevent the deportation of criminals, hate preachers, people who consort with known terrorists, and people who refuse to integrate, then everything else is irrelevant.

      This time it is NOT “the economy, stupid”!

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.