Latest from UKIP Daily

LABOUR’S DUPLICITY

A week is a long time in politics, as the German agent Harold ‘von’ Wilson once observed. Not so long ago the media were asking whether there was any ongoing role for UKIP after the referendum. Labour had successfully wooed working class voters in the Midlands and the North by promising to support Brexit. Labour also promised opposition to the single market.

It turns out that Labour were lying. On Monday, 11th September they voted against the EU (Withdrawal) Bill at Second Reading. Not only that, they are now talking about ‘interim’ single market membership for such a lengthy period they are clearly thinking of permanently trapping us inside it.

Frances O’Grady, the economically illiterate General Secretary of the TUC, has openly called for permanent single market membership. Put shortly the TUC, desperate to give British jobs to European workers, wants to see continued uncontrolled labour dumping from Europe. Then they have the cheek to complain about wages being driven downwards!

Tony ‘von’ Blair, whose contempt for democracy was established when he rammed through the Nice and Amsterdam treaties without a referendum, has engaged in open defiance of the referendum result. Pro-Labour newspapers like the Guardian daily print articles attacking Brexit from the likes of Remoaners such as Matthew d’Ancona. He is scarcely more economically literate than Frances O’Grady. None of these articles of course engages the case for Brexit or even attempts to grapple with the costings of EU membership put forward by serious economists like Tim Congdon.

I have no personal issues with Jeremy Corbyn. We’ve met, as it happens, demonstrating together outside the US Embassy against the American invasion of Grenada. However, he is now open to a charge of deceiving the electorate.

Labour’s U-turn on Brexit did not happen overnight. Pro-Europeans in the party were obviously planning the switch months ago, probably from the time that the Brexit bill safely achieved its passage through Parliament after that silly litigation by Gina Miller. (Having deluded herself into believing that the perfectly proper deal between the Tories and those nice people the DUP was being sneaked through without Parliamentary sanction for the public expenditure involved, she has been threatening further silly litigation.)

Jeremy Corbyn now has to answer the question: when did he decide on the U-turn? No doubt it was forced on him, since his instincts on Europe are generally sound, but when was it forced? It’s no thanks to Jeremy that, helped by principled Labour Brexiteers, the Withdrawal Bill got over its first Parliamentary hurdle.

Labour will only have themselves to blame if their voters now turn to UKIP. Democracy is degraded if parties act in bad faith and deceive the electorate.

There are no legal remedies, only political ones. You take your revenge at the ballot box, not in the courtroom. Leaving aside the inability of the courts, with respect, to adjudicate fairly on matters touching our EU membership, it isn’t illegal to deceive the electorate.

The notorious paedophile Edward Heath lied his way through the 1970 General Election campaign. The Yes side lied shamelessly about the impact on sovereignty and the balance of payments in the 1975 referendum and the Remain side followed their example in 2016, using rigged export statistics. According to the Remain side, South Korea is in the European Union! They also falsely claimed that the EU is the world’s largest market. (NAFTA is far bigger.)  

A political promise is only as good as the politician making it. Not every politician has Nigel Farage’s integrity. Very often what you see is not what you get.

Happily, Labour’s change of heart may not make much of a difference. With the help of Labour rebels Theresa May has the numbers in the House of Commons. The vote in the Lords on the Henry VIII powers will be tight, but it is difficult to see the unelected Lords being so rash as to defy the popular will on Brexit. The Withdrawal Bill should reach the statute book.

The Henry VIII Powers

The hypocrisy of the Remoaners knows no bounds. Section 2(2) of the European Communities Act 1972 is the single most used Henry VIII power in our history. Even King Henry VIII didn’t go as far, and he had the excuse of the threat from our community partner King Francis I of France.

Henry VIII’s approach to legislating by proclamation is not necessarily any better a precedent to follow than his approach to the resolution of matrimonial disputes. I am sanguine about the Henry VIII power’s falling foul of Parliament. I do not share David Davis’s mad desire to deprive us of much of the economic benefit of Brexit by lumbering us with idiotic EU regulations.

The Anglo-European Negotiations

As I have predicted on these pages, the negotiations are failing, indeed they have already collapsed in all but name. It’s all about the blame game now.

Just to reiterate – there is no provision in Article 50 for exit payments. A departing state is obliged to contribute to the EU budget during the notice period, but has no obligations thereafter. I am entirely in agreement with the recent LFB (‘Lawyers For Britain’) paper on this.

It seems odd to be talking about payments from the UK to Europe when Germany is potentially liable for huge reparations over armed attacks on the UK such as the Piper Alpha oil rig sabotage in 1988. Germany’s liability over Piper Alpha alone runs into tens of billions of pounds when reinsurance losses and interest are taken into account. If need be these reparations could be levied by way of punitive tariffs on German imports, at say 25%.   

Since no deal will be better than any deal the EU would agree to the latest news from Brussels is encouraging. Juncker is now reduced to uttering threats. If by us regretting our departure from the EU he is hinting at the planned Spanish attack on Gibraltar he’d better realise that we know about that one and are making cunning plans.   

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Michael Shrimpton
About Michael Shrimpton (33 Articles)
Michael Shrimpton is a prominent Eurosceptic, having advised the Maastricht rebels. He is a former Chairman of the Bruges Group and former National Committee member of the Campaign for an Independent Britain. He defected to the Tory Party in 1997, mainly on the issue of Europe. As a barrister he led the defence of the Metric Martyrs. His major intelligence text Spyhunter: The Secret History of German Intelligence was published by June Press in 2014. He has written on European matters for The Times and Eurofacts.

13 Comments on LABOUR’S DUPLICITY

  1. For those readers interested in the Piper Alpha sabotage I’ve just had a more detailed commentary published on http://www.Veterans.Today.com, under the heading “Hitting Back At Jerry”.

    The key to understanding how the Germans sabotaged the rig is to be found in the report by Arthur D Little, engineering consultants, which was suppressed from the Cullen Inquiry, reducing it to a farce, with respect to Lord Cullen.

  2. Responding in greater detail, false prospectus offences relate to company law. Legally you can tell as many lies as you like in a political manifesto – the problem comes when you’re found out, as Labour have been now.

    The Electoral Commission police elections in theory, but like all quangos they report to the Cabinet Office, which is pro-EU, and lack independence. There is no known case of the Electoral Commission intervening in favour of a pro-British candidate or party, with the possible exception of the result in Thanet House, where the jury is still out, almost literally.

    There is little point expecting Wikipedia to be reliable about a known Brexiteer – their entry about me is mostly junk. This is the same website recycling Nazi propaganda about the Me 262 being the world’s first jet fighter, a wholly untrue claim exposed for what it was in the 1960s by the then editor of Jane’ All The World’s Aircraft, J W R Taylor.

    The prosecution was ordered by the Cabinet Office, which controls most police forces and the CPS. The jury were nobbled and the MOD destroyed their recording of my briefing about the nuclear warhead smuggled into London, one of two, both of which were later recovered by the Americans. So far as I can tell, CCRC also report to the Cabinet Office. Their investigation to date has been a farce, no offence intended.

    Responding re Piper Alpha the rig was indeed destroyed, by Germany’s GO2. Sabotage was confirmed by Arthur D. Little in a report submitted to Armand Hammer a few months later. The report was suppressed from Lloyd’s of London and Lord Cullen’s with respect failed inquiry.
    I have spoken to one of the report’s authors, a consulting engineer. HMG and the Scottish Executive are believed to have copies of the report, but are suppressing them from the defrauded insurers and the police.

    167 men were murdered in total. Whitehall and the CIA are happy to act as accessories after the fact to the murders rather than tangle with GO2 or the DVD.

  3. In the old days, wasn’t what Labour offered in its manifesto called a false prospectus? And wasn’t that legally liable? What a long way we have travelled.

  4. I’m speaking at ghe Bases Conference in Dublin and will respond in greater depth when I get back. The 2014 convictions were of course crocks and are currently with CCRC. UKIP are well aware of them of course, indeed I have referred to them on UKIP Daily

  5. The simple reason Labour want a long transition is to extend it until they (might) get into power, then the game changes. It must not be allowed to happen.

  6. Well, Mr Shrimpton is new to me…

    “Shrimpton was convicted in 2014 for falsely reporting that Germany was planning a nuclear attack on the 2012 Summer Olympics.”

    Truth dies in darkness. Where people are not talking, ignorance and mistrust festers. Where people gather in cliques, misunderstandings and falsehoods develop. Where liars are not challenged, liars gather.

    Why is UKIP vulnerable to shrimptons? Plainly the disfunction of the NEC, the factionalism, and the presence of shrimptons on a UKIP discussion site are all of a piece. Lots of tiny fiefdoms and tyrannies, closely defended, with little exchange between them. How appropriate for a party of strong borders.

    • Chris, I suggest that you do some more research on his conviction, then consider which side you believe.

      For me he is a man of integrity but you must make up your own mind after considering all the facts.

      • Integrated what? Set alongside the piper alpha stuff above, I’m happy with what I found.
        I did read the rest of his Wikipedia page, and … human psychology can be truly a strange stew

  7. What was this all about?:

    ”. . . huge reparations over armed attacks on the UK such as the *Piper Alpha oil rig sabotage* in 1988. Germany’s liability over Piper Alpha alone runs into tens of billions of pounds when reinsurance losses and interest are taken into account.”

    I knew people on the platform, including one survivor.
    And I have the two volume Dept of Energy Public Enquiry on my bookshelf to my left, so I shall never forget them.

    So do tell.

  8. Intrigued by your comments about German involvement in Piper Alpha. Can you enlarge?
    I worked at Lloyd’s at the time and got a fair amount of name-related ribbing but never heard suggestions of foul play.

  9. I think the only way to bring sense to the negotiations is to walk away now. Pay our contributions until March 2019 and then that’s it. If the EU wants more, come and talk to us. We are going through a charade at the moment. I definitely do not want a “transition” period which is just staying in by another name.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*